Every AssessFit assessment follows international testing standards, is monitored continuously with live item statistics, and gives every employer a built-in validity study against real job performance. The full methodology is public: read the technical manual.
Each of 1,000+ job titles in our catalog maps to the abilities, knowledge, and work styles that differentiate top performers — every bundle is inspectable and editable.
Items are authored to explicit rules — one defensible key, plausible distractors, concepts over trivia, culture-light contexts — then machine-validated for composition and balanced key positions.
From the first real answer onward, every item's difficulty, discrimination, and response time are measured continuously — including responses from our free practice assessments.
Items that prove too easy, too hard, or non-discriminating are flagged and rotated out; a negative discrimination triggers an answer-key review. Every employer also gets a built-in validity dashboard against real job performance.
Most assessment vendors publish claims. We publish live measurements — the numbers below come straight from the platform's own database, right now.
Every one of our 100 tests is a bank of difficulty-tagged items. Each item's difficulty and discrimination are measured continuously against real candidate data — weak items are flagged and retired.
Norm groups are built from real completions and always labeled with their true sample size — a percentile against 40 real candidates says "n = 40", never an inflated marketing number.
Every employer gets a built-in predictive-validity dashboard: rate the people you hired, and AssessFit shows the correlation between their test scores and real job performance — evidence from your company, not our brochure.
Our development and documentation practices align with:
Candidate results you can trust: